Welcome to Subscribe On Youtube
-
/** 1095. Find in Mountain Array (This problem is an interactive problem.) You may recall that an array A is a mountain array if and only if: A.length >= 3 There exists some i with 0 < i < A.length - 1 such that: A[0] < A[1] < ... A[i-1] < A[i] A[i] > A[i+1] > ... > A[A.length - 1] Given a mountain array mountainArr, return the minimum index such that mountainArr.get(index) == target. If such an index doesn't exist, return -1. You can't access the mountain array directly. You may only access the array using a MountainArray interface: MountainArray.get(k) returns the element of the array at index k (0-indexed). MountainArray.length() returns the length of the array. Submissions making more than 100 calls to MountainArray.get will be judged Wrong Answer. Also, any solutions that attempt to circumvent the judge will result in disqualification. Example 1: Input: array = [1,2,3,4,5,3,1], target = 3 Output: 2 Explanation: 3 exists in the array, at index=2 and index=5. Return the minimum index, which is 2. Example 2: Input: array = [0,1,2,4,2,1], target = 3 Output: -1 Explanation: 3 does not exist in the array, so we return -1. Constraints: 3 <= mountain_arr.length() <= 10000 0 <= target <= 10^9 0 <= mountain_arr.get(index) <= 10^9 @tag-array */ public class Find_in_Mountain_Array { /** * // This is MountainArray's API interface. * // You should not implement it, or speculate about its implementation * interface MountainArray { * public int get(int index) {} * public int length() {} * } */ class Solution { int findInMountainArray(int target, MountainArray A) { int n = A.length(), l, r, m, peak = 0; // find index of peak l = 0; r = n - 1; while (l < r) { m = (l + r) / 2; if (A.get(m) < A.get(m + 1)) l = peak = m + 1; else r = m; } // find target in the left of peak l = 0; r = peak; while (l <= r) { m = (l + r) / 2; if (A.get(m) < target) l = m + 1; else if (A.get(m) > target) r = m - 1; else return m; } // find target in the right of peak l = peak; r = n - 1; while (l <= r) { m = (l + r) / 2; if (A.get(m) > target) l = m + 1; else if (A.get(m) < target) r = m - 1; else return m; } return -1; } } class MountainArray { public int get(int x) { return 0; } public int length() { return 0; } } } ############ class Solution { public int findInMountainArray(int target, MountainArray mountainArr) { int length = mountainArr.length(); int l = 0, r = length - 1; while (l < r) { int mid = l + r >>> 1; if (mountainArr.get(mid) > mountainArr.get(mid + 1)) r = mid; else l = mid + 1; } int topIndex = r; int topValue = mountainArr.get(topIndex); if (target == topValue) return topIndex; if (target > topValue) return -1; l = 0; r = topIndex - 1; while (l < r) { int mid = l + r >>> 1; if (mountainArr.get(mid) >= target) r = mid; else l = mid + 1; } if (mountainArr.get(r) == target) { return r; } l = topIndex + 1; r = length - 1; while (l < r) { int mid = l + r >>> 1; if (mountainArr.get(mid) <= target) r = mid; else l = mid + 1; } return mountainArr.get(r) == target ? r : -1; } }
-
// OJ: https://leetcode.com/problems/find-in-mountain-array/ // Time: O(logN) // Space: O(1) class Solution { int binarySearch(int target, MountainArray &A, int L, int R, int dir) { while (L <= R) { int M = (L + R) / 2, val = A.get(M); if (val == target) return M; bool left = (dir == 1 && val < target) || (dir == -1 && val > target); if (left) L = M + 1; else R = M - 1; } return -1; } int findTop(MountainArray &A, int N) { int L = 0, R = N - 1; while (L <= R) { int M = (L + R) / 2, left = M - 1 >= 0 ? A.get(M - 1) : INT_MIN, val = A.get(M), right = M + 1 < N ? A.get(M + 1) : INT_MIN; if (val > left && val > right) return M; else if (val < left) R = M - 1; else L = M + 1; } return -1; } public: int findInMountainArray(int target, MountainArray &A) { int N = A.length(), top = findTop(A, N); int a = binarySearch(target, A, 0, top, 1); int b = binarySearch(target, A, top + 1, N - 1, -1); return a != -1 ? a : b; } };
-
# """ # This is MountainArray's API interface. # You should not implement it, or speculate about its implementation # """ #class MountainArray: # def get(self, index: int) -> int: # def length(self) -> int: class Solution: def findInMountainArray(self, target: int, nums: 'nums') -> int: N = nums.length() peek = self.findPeek(target, nums) left_index = self.findInAscOrder(target, nums, 0, peek) right_index = self.findInDecOrder(target, nums, peek, N - 1) if left_index != -1: return left_index else: return right_index def findPeek(self, target, nums): N = nums.length() left, right = 1, N - 2 while left <= right: mid = left + (right - left) // 2 if nums.get(mid - 1) < nums.get(mid) > nums.get(mid + 1): return mid elif nums.get(mid - 1) < nums.get(mid) < nums.get(mid + 1): left = mid + 1 else: right = mid - 1 return left def findInAscOrder(self, target, nums, begin, end): left, right = begin, end while left <= right: mid = left + (right - left) // 2 print(left, right, mid) cur = nums.get(mid) if cur == target: return mid elif cur < target: left = mid + 1 else: right = mid - 1 return -1 def findInDecOrder(self, target, nums, begin, end): left, right = begin, end while left <= right: mid = left + (right - left) // 2 cur = nums.get(mid) if cur == target: return mid elif cur < target: right = mid - 1 else: left = mid + 1 return -1
-
/** * // This is the MountainArray's API interface. * // You should not implement it, or speculate about its implementation * type MountainArray struct { * } * * func (this *MountainArray) get(index int) int {} * func (this *MountainArray) length() int {} */ func findInMountainArray(target int, mountainArr *MountainArray) int { n := mountainArr.length() l, r := 0, n-1 for l < r { mid := (l + r) >> 1 if mountainArr.get(mid) > mountainArr.get(mid+1) { r = mid } else { l = mid + 1 } } search := func(l, r, k int) int { for l < r { mid := (l + r) >> 1 if k*mountainArr.get(mid) >= k*target { r = mid } else { l = mid + 1 } } if mountainArr.get(l) == target { return l } return -1 } ans := search(0, l, 1) if ans == -1 { return search(l+1, n-1, -1) } return ans }
-
/** * // This is the MountainArray's API interface. * // You should not implement it, or speculate about its implementation * class Master { * get(index: number): number {} * * length(): number {} * } */ function findInMountainArray(target: number, mountainArr: MountainArray) { const n = mountainArr.length(); let l = 0; let r = n - 1; while (l < r) { const mid = (l + r) >> 1; if (mountainArr.get(mid) > mountainArr.get(mid + 1)) { r = mid; } else { l = mid + 1; } } const search = (l: number, r: number, k: number): number => { while (l < r) { const mid = (l + r) >> 1; if (k * mountainArr.get(mid) >= k * target) { r = mid; } else { l = mid + 1; } } return mountainArr.get(l) === target ? l : -1; }; const ans = search(0, l, 1); return ans === -1 ? search(l + 1, n - 1, -1) : ans; }
-
impl Solution { #[allow(dead_code)] pub fn find_in_mountain_array(target: i32, mountain_arr: &MountainArray) -> i32 { let n = mountain_arr.length(); // First find the maximum element in the array let mut l = 0; let mut r = n - 1; while l < r { let mid = (l + r) >> 1; if mountain_arr.get(mid) > mountain_arr.get(mid + 1) { r = mid; } else { l = mid + 1; } } let left = Self::binary_search(mountain_arr, 0, l, 1, target); if left == -1 { Self::binary_search(mountain_arr, l, n - 1, -1, target) } else { left } } #[allow(dead_code)] fn binary_search(m: &MountainArray, mut l: i32, mut r: i32, k: i32, target: i32) -> i32 { let n = m.length(); while l < r { let mid = (l + r) >> 1; if k * m.get(mid) >= k * target { r = mid; } else { l = mid + 1; } } if m.get(l) == target { l } else { -1 } } }